Hosted by site sponsor WebMate.







Unibody MacBook Pro Q&A

Revision Published March 14, 2008

All Mac Q&As >> Unibody MacBook Pro Q&A | Also See: All MacBook Pro Specs

To be notified of new Q&As, sign up for EveryMac.com's bimonthly email list.




How much faster is the "Late 2008/Unibody" 15-Inch MacBook Pro than the "Early 2008 Penryn" MacBook Pro Core 2 Duo?

Please note that all MacBook Pro models mentioned in this Q&A have been discontinued. However, this Q&A is up-to-date and quite useful for anyone considering one of these notebooks on the used market.

Quickly review a comparison of the "Late 2008/Unibody" MacBook Pro models to the "Early 2008 Penryn" models that they replaced and it becomes readily apparent that the "Unibody" systems have improvements in design and architecture but have processors of effectively identical speed.

Early 2008/Late 2008 MacBook Pro
Photo Credit: Apple, Inc (Early/Late 2008 15-Inch MacBook Pro)

The 15-Inch "Early 2008 Penryn" MacBook Pro Core 2 Duo systems -- the MacBook Pro "Core 2 Duo" 2.4 15" (Early 2008) and "Core 2 Duo" 2.5 15" (Early 2008) -- have 2.4 GHz or 2.5 GHz Core 2 Duo processors and the "Late 2008/Unibody" MacBook Pro models -- the MacBook Pro "Core 2 Duo" 2.4 15" (Unibody) and MacBook Pro "Core 2 Duo" 2.53 15" (Unibody) -- have 2.4 GHz or 2.53 GHz Core 2 Duo processors (on March 3, 2009, the 2.53 GHz model was quietly bumped to a 2.66 GHz processor).

Architecturally, however, the "Late 2008/Unibody" models use a faster architecture with a faster system bus -- 1066 MHz up from 800 MHz -- faster memory -- 1066 MHz PC3-8500 DDR3 compared to 667 MHz PC2-5300 DDR2, and faster and dual graphics processors -- a NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT with dedicated GDDR3 SDRAM and a NVIDIA GeForce 9400M with 256 MB of DDR3 SDRAM shared with main memory compared to a single NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT.

With practically identical processor speeds and a modestly faster architecture, one should not expect a substantial difference in overall performance. For the precise difference, however, real-world testing is required.

Real-World Test Results

In its review of the "Unibody" MacBook Pro models, the industry-standard MacWorld ran Speedmark version 5 tests -- the publication's standard test suite -- as well as Photoshop tests while using the GeForce 9600M GT graphics processor and found that:

In our Speedmark test, the 2.53 GHz topped its 2.4 GHz sibling by 7.5 percent and the previous 2.4 GHz MacBook Pro by 15 percent. It bested its slower sibling by 16 percent in our suite of Photoshop tests. It was nearly twice as fast in its Photoshop operations as the previous generation's 2.4 GHz model.
The new entry level 2.4 GHz MacBook Pro scored 8 percent faster in Speedmark than the older 2.4 GHz model, and 12 percent faster at Photoshop.

In an in-depth review, the always excellent ArsTechnica subjected the MacBook Pro to a series of tests running GeekBench, XBench, and Cinebench as well as Windows and Mac gaming tests. The full test results should be read in their entirety, but two items worth noting -- reflecting the processor and graphics performance, respectively -- include:

It's evident that this MacBook Pro is not that much faster than its predecessor as far as the CPU goes. In our testing using GeekBench, the 2.53GHz, late 2008 model was only about 2.5% faster than the previous model.
For those upgrading from previous generation notebooks using the NVIDIA GeForce 8600M (Merom MacBook and Pros) will see a small bump in OpenGL performance (13-17%) but nothing mind-blowing.

No MacBook Pro performance comparison would be complete without input from the superb BareFeats, which put the "Unibody" MacBook Pro models through a battery of tests including ones focused on gaming. The site also included the "Unbody" MacBook Pro custom configured with a faster 2.8 GHz Core 2 Duo processor and concluded:

The fastest "Late 2008" MacBook Pro (2.8 GHz) is about 20% faster than its fastest [custom configured] predecessor ("Early 2008" MBP 2.6 GHz) when it comes to 3D accelerated game benchmarks. . .
Some of you are debating whether the 2.8 GHz MBP is worth [US]$300 more than a comparably equipped 2.53 GHz MBP. That is a 12% delta in price. That syncs with CPU intensive apps which average 11% faster, but when it comes to 3D games, the 2.8's advantage ranges from 0% to 10% (or 6% average for the five games [tested]).

Performance Summary

Ultimately, the "Late 2008/Unibody" MacBook Pro models are modestly faster than their predecessors in most tasks and quite a bit faster in selected graphics tasks -- as one would expect from evaluating their respective specifications -- and provide excellent performance with a sleek design.

In the US, site sponsor Adorama sells new MacBook Pro models with free shipping. Other World Computing and JemJem sell used and refurb MacBook Pro models at bargain prices with free shipping, as well. On the other hand, if you need to sell a MacBook Pro, A+ BBB-rated Cash for Your Mac and GoRoostr will buy your older notebook with an instant quote and prompt payment.

In the UK, site sponsor Hoxton Macs sells used MacBook Pro models with a one-year warranty and free next day delivery throughout the UK. Delivery across Europe also is available starting at just £9.99 for two-day delivery to France and Germany.

In Australia, site sponsor Mac City likewise has a variety of used MacBook Pro models sold at low prices and available with a free warranty and fast shipping across Australia.



Permalink | Report an Error/Typo | Sign Up for Site Update Notices




<< Unibody MacBook Pro Q&A (Main) | Also See: All MacBook Pro Specs




Established in 1996, EveryMac.com has been created by experts with decades of experience with Apple hardware. EveryMac.com includes, and always has included, original research incorporating detailed, hands-on inspection of packaging, computers, and devices as well as extensive real-world use. All information is provided in good faith, but no website or person is perfect. Accordingly, EveryMac.com is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind whatsoever. EveryMac.com, and the authors thereof, shall not be held responsible or liable, under any circumstances, for any damages resulting from the use or inability to use the information within. For complete disclaimer and copyright information please read and understand the Terms of Use and the Privacy Policy before using EveryMac.com. Copying, scraping, or use of any content without expressed permission is not allowed, although links to any page are welcomed and appreciated.